Thursday, December 14, 2006

Jimmy Carter: Anti-Semite

On the Tonight Show with Jay Leno,

Carter: "I don't want to see Apartheid, but in Palestinian territory there's horrible persecution of the Palestinians who live on their own land. They have occupied the land, they have confiscated, they've colonized it and they've forced Palestinians away from their homes, away from their pastures, away from their fields, cut down their olive trees and severely persecuted the Palestinians."

Why is this man given any type of credit about ANYTHING! He was one of the most worthless presidents in this great country's history. In some people's interpretation, my own included, Jimmy Carter started all the problems that we have in the middle-east right now. That's more than likely the reason he's attacking Israel. He doesn't want his own Iran debacle to be passed around again and ruin his legacy, so he is tranferring blame.

Some more. This is with Tim Russert when asked about the Jewish lobby.

Russert: "There's no doubt there's a stronger adversion to criticizing Israel in this country. I wouldn't say it's all because of intimidation, but that's one factor."

Carter: "It's almost completely unacceptable in this country for any public official to criticize the policies of Israel, even if they are horribly abusive against the Palestinians. (Unintelligible). The Jewish lobby may be part of it."

Go back to building houses or pickin peanuts, Carter. Hopefully, the United States won't stand for such anti-semetism or racism of any sort. But he will probably be forgiven. Well, he already has. Not many media outlets are even taking issue with the facts of his book, just the "hard hitting issues that people don't want to talk about".

Friday, December 08, 2006

Iraq Study Group: "Unity More Important Than Victory"

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Sorry I have to cite the USIP for this, but oh well.

Just wanted to bring up some points on this. They have already been touched on by others, but I really want to repeat them because it's entertaining.

Quote from page 32: "Externally, the United States should immediately begin to employ all elements of American power to construct a regional mechanism that can support, rather than retard, progress in Iraq."

All elements of American power. This is what I love about these appointed commissions. They're supposed to help the problem by coming up with complicated solutions us simpletons wouldn't be able to figure out on our own because they are smarter than us. Then what do they do? They state something and don't have to have any explaination or actual plan. They just have to say "All elements of American power." The people writing this don't even understand what that means. More quotes to prove my point.

Quote from the same page, next section, talking about Iran and Syria helping us out:

"This support structure should include every country that has an interest in averting a chaotic Iraq, including all of Iraq's neighbors-Iran and Syria among them."

Now, anyone with a brain cell in their skull knows that a stable Iraq is NOT in Iran or Syria's interest. The opposite is true. Why would they be funding rogue militias and Islamic militants and terrorists if they were interested in a unified Iraq. They don't want a unified Iraq. THEY WANT IRAQ!

Quote from recommendation 5 on page 36, talking about the Iraq Support Group:

"The Support Group should consist of Iraq and all the states bordering Iraq, including Iran and Syria; the key regional states, including Egypt and the Gulf States; the five permanent members of the UN Security Council; the EU; and, of course, Iraq itself."

Now, what is the first thing they say. Now look at the last thing they say. Idiots. The lot of them. They had over 6 months to write this report. This is supposed to be guiding our congress and president to be "more intelligent" about Iraq.

Quote from recommendation 19:

"The President and the leadership of his national security team should remain in close and frequent contact with the Iraqi leadership."

I would type that again if this post wasn't already so long. The stupidity contained in the last two statements is embarrassingly obvious and makes it harder and harder to dig through this thing, but over the next few days, I will hopefully have some more stuff for ya.

NEWS ALERT! Muslim Boy Urinates on Bible! Peace Ensues!

I always thought we were meant to believe that Christians are the bad, evil ones.

Jimmy Carter's New Book Hits Some Flak

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Former President Jimmy Carter: Terrorist lover and evil, or just plain stupid?

The funniest part of this story is how he doesn't EVER defend his book by saying it states facts. The facts are what are called into question, along with proper use of maps and citing sources. If you read the article, it clearly shows what "President" Carter has made clear over the last 15 to 20 years:

He doesn't care about the facts.
He cares about despots.
He cares about tyrants.
He cares about murderers.
He cares not for the Israeli state.
He cares, probably, only about himself and his legacy. Much like "President" Clinton.

Another Response to the 9/11 Conspiracy Nut

If you didn't see my comment about "Jeff's" comment, here it is for ya.

"I presume he's talking about the pancaking theory that is used to explain the collapse of the tower. The question is how could it fall at free-fall speed if it had resistance on the way down. No science. According to conspiracy theorists the collapse took 7 seconds, with constant acceleration close to gravitional. Seismic evidence and videos of the roof of the building show the collapse took 37 seconds; conspiracy theorists base their assumptions on video footage that shows only the collapse of the outer wall."

Friday, December 01, 2006

Old News, but Still Relevant

Isn't it funny how, statistically, you are more likely in the US to be killed in a car wreck than a soldier in Iraq being killed by a IED. In my state of Indiana alone in 1999 and 2000 there were 1,895 fatalities from car accidents.(http://www.car-accidents.com/pages/stats/2000_by_state.html)


In some areas of our country with the land area of Iraq, I've heard that drunk drivers kill more people than this Iraq insurgency.
Or the fact that, just in California, six more murders, 27 rapes, 38 arsons, 180 robberies, and 360 instances of assault in California — yesterday, today, tomorrow, and every day. (http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/cacrime.htm)
Just since the war started in 2001, there have been over 10,000 murders, almost 40,000 rapes (actually down quite a bit from the 90s), so on and so forth, just in CALIFORNIA! Also, let us not speak of the prison conditions in CA either. We pay $7 billion to keep our prisoners in CA a YEAR! Also, over 3 million foreigners who snuck in illegally now live in CA, and that's with just ONE BORDER! Also, there are about 15,000 convicted alien felons incarcerated in our penal system, costing about $500 million a year.


We need to pull out of California, America! Let the Californians deal with their own problems! Let us hand control over to them. Or at LEAST give them a deadline for withdrawl.
Or get President Bush to give us a plan!


If you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic....