MWA HAHAHAHAH!!! MWAHAHAHAHAH! MWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
(breath....breath....)
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
Sunday, April 30, 2006
The 9/11 Untruth
You know, I hardly want to bring any attention to website I'm about to mention just because I think it's some of the most ridiculous drivel I've ever seen.
I signed up for a myspace account just so I could keep in contact with some of my friends around the country. I found this political group as one of the forums on this site:
9/11 Truth
I read most of the articles that were feature on this site. Now, I could understand most of the points they make if I was thinking with the logic of an eight year old.
These people are throwing around so many half-truths and theories they are calling proof that the current administation planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks that most of the people who read or call themselves members of this group can't even follow it. They probably say to themselves, "Well, if it's that complicated, it MUST be true!" They even site the wrong information on steel, one of the biggest arguements for their view. Also, if they looked at the engineering of this particular building, they could easily see the problems with their points. One fellow points out:
Quote from Popular Mechanics:
"CLAIM: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel."
End quote.
Now, I invite ANYONE to just go ahead, get on a search engine, and find what the melting point of steel is because 2750 is the melting point for iron, steel is more around 2500, depending on how much iron is involved in making this fine alloy, and if jet fuel burns NORMALLY at 800 to 1500 F (a HUGE variance in tempurature anyway), what would the tempurature of an explosion of 10,000 gallons of jet fuel get up to?
Next is one of "their" responses:
"Steel is an excellent conductor of heat, so when you apply heat to a steel structure the heat spreads quickly. So the heat from the fires would have spread through the entire steel structure of each tower. The Twin Towers contained 200,000 tons of steel. Are we expected to believe that the fires from two loads of jet fuel provided sufficient heat to raise 200,000 tons of steel to the point where it became critically weak?"
So what these treasonous liars are saying here is that since heat spreads through steel quickly, it speads through all steel that is touching or connected in any way and must spread evenly throughout before the warping of such steel starts. Quite a reach, my dim-witted friends. Also, they state that no other steel supported building has ever fallen down because of a fire. This wasn't a fire, this was an EXPLOSION that took out the fireproofing with the blast. Smoldering fires themselves cannot do this, thus cannot be compaired fully to this situation.
Another quote, and I was laughing so HARD by the end of this.
Quote:
Read through Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11: Claim #6. Then go to the top and read it all. Then follow the links to other articles on this website showing that the official story is bogus. Then follow the links to the many other websites which demonstrate that 9/11 was an inside job. Too busy? Oh, well, then, if you don't care to know what really happened on 9/11 ... End quote.
I read it. Only helped to nullify their own arguements. These people put links up on their site to prove their point, and they don't even read the entire story. They, as typical empty-headed idiotarians, read the first paragraph and say to themselves, "Aw Naw! I just cracked Bush's code! I'm going to have to tell this to the other guys at the "Food Not Bombs" meeting! They ain't gonna believe this!" Take another hit off the pipe and keep living in your own world, you jackasses, and stop messing with mine!
These people go on to compare President Bush with Hitler in many ways. They show their agenda through the entire page, but under the guise of "Wanting only the truth". They already have their truth. They say President Bush did it. This is their religion that this aethist idiot has drawn people into. Oh oh, one more quote and I'll be done. This is an example of their pursuit of the "Truth". I was reading through a few of the link texts they had published on their site and this message came up in part of it.
Quote:
Pentagon:
Be aware, there are two theories about the Pentagon
The 'missle' theory, and the 757--"Official" theory.
In actuality, neither has enough evidence to fully support it.
We can never know until they release the video footage
Pentagon Analysis
Supposed 'plane' video = Is this a 757?
Possibly a plane
End quote.
They just said, right there, plain as day they are not interested in the truth. It doesn't matter what proof or evidence you could ever show them, they would never believe you. These people have such a hatred for our own country that they cannot bring themselves to look at the FACTS. Oh, no. You can't be bothered to follow such trivial things like FACTS! I could get a TIME MACHINE, take them back to 9/11, and show them FIRST HAND that terrorists blew up the WTC, they'd fall to the ground, kicking and flailing their arms, screaming, "NO! BUSH DID IT! BUSH DID IT! NO WMDS!!!!!" They call us ignorant and stupid for having the wool pulled over OUR eyes. They are condescending assholes who have no knowledge of the past 50 years of international politics, no knowledge of American politics in the past or present, and no knowledge of how to use deductive reasoning to come to conclusions. They have to listen to everyone else who carries around a piece of poorly printed and poorly spelled ANSWER propaganda and has at least 15 objects made of hemp hanging from their flea infested sacs they call necks because they are the 'enlightened' ones.
Final thing, I swear. This one's really good. Ok, here's a picture showing the impact site on the Pentagon where flight 77 hit. This was taken on Sept. 14th, 2001.

Now here is the picture they have up on their website.

Now, I have no idea what the date was when this picture was taken or what the sudden color distortion is (it certainly is NOT smoke), but I can easily guess this picture was changed in multiple ways. I mean, LOOK AT IT! They must think we're complete morons. (Or at least the 15,000 people who are members of this group)
Also, if you go to the website here you can also see a picture where they superimposed a picture of the supposed plane, and it's point is to debunk the hole in the Pentagon. They couldn't even keep the line straight with the fuselage. HILARIOUS!
If anyone is truely concerned about knowing what happened that day, it's all right here and not that hard to understand. This was probably the longest post I've ever had on here, but I didn't even scratch the surface with these guys. I could have a weekly update where I find something else they're lying about and put up the evidence right here. We'll have to see.
I signed up for a myspace account just so I could keep in contact with some of my friends around the country. I found this political group as one of the forums on this site:
9/11 Truth
I read most of the articles that were feature on this site. Now, I could understand most of the points they make if I was thinking with the logic of an eight year old.
These people are throwing around so many half-truths and theories they are calling proof that the current administation planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks that most of the people who read or call themselves members of this group can't even follow it. They probably say to themselves, "Well, if it's that complicated, it MUST be true!" They even site the wrong information on steel, one of the biggest arguements for their view. Also, if they looked at the engineering of this particular building, they could easily see the problems with their points. One fellow points out:
Quote from Popular Mechanics:
"CLAIM: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel."
End quote.
Now, I invite ANYONE to just go ahead, get on a search engine, and find what the melting point of steel is because 2750 is the melting point for iron, steel is more around 2500, depending on how much iron is involved in making this fine alloy, and if jet fuel burns NORMALLY at 800 to 1500 F (a HUGE variance in tempurature anyway), what would the tempurature of an explosion of 10,000 gallons of jet fuel get up to?
Next is one of "their" responses:
"Steel is an excellent conductor of heat, so when you apply heat to a steel structure the heat spreads quickly. So the heat from the fires would have spread through the entire steel structure of each tower. The Twin Towers contained 200,000 tons of steel. Are we expected to believe that the fires from two loads of jet fuel provided sufficient heat to raise 200,000 tons of steel to the point where it became critically weak?"
So what these treasonous liars are saying here is that since heat spreads through steel quickly, it speads through all steel that is touching or connected in any way and must spread evenly throughout before the warping of such steel starts. Quite a reach, my dim-witted friends. Also, they state that no other steel supported building has ever fallen down because of a fire. This wasn't a fire, this was an EXPLOSION that took out the fireproofing with the blast. Smoldering fires themselves cannot do this, thus cannot be compaired fully to this situation.
Another quote, and I was laughing so HARD by the end of this.
Quote:
Read through Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11: Claim #6. Then go to the top and read it all. Then follow the links to other articles on this website showing that the official story is bogus. Then follow the links to the many other websites which demonstrate that 9/11 was an inside job. Too busy? Oh, well, then, if you don't care to know what really happened on 9/11 ... End quote.
I read it. Only helped to nullify their own arguements. These people put links up on their site to prove their point, and they don't even read the entire story. They, as typical empty-headed idiotarians, read the first paragraph and say to themselves, "Aw Naw! I just cracked Bush's code! I'm going to have to tell this to the other guys at the "Food Not Bombs" meeting! They ain't gonna believe this!" Take another hit off the pipe and keep living in your own world, you jackasses, and stop messing with mine!
These people go on to compare President Bush with Hitler in many ways. They show their agenda through the entire page, but under the guise of "Wanting only the truth". They already have their truth. They say President Bush did it. This is their religion that this aethist idiot has drawn people into. Oh oh, one more quote and I'll be done. This is an example of their pursuit of the "Truth". I was reading through a few of the link texts they had published on their site and this message came up in part of it.
Quote:
Pentagon:
Be aware, there are two theories about the Pentagon
The 'missle' theory, and the 757--"Official" theory.
In actuality, neither has enough evidence to fully support it.
We can never know until they release the video footage
Pentagon Analysis
Supposed 'plane' video = Is this a 757?
Possibly a plane
End quote.
They just said, right there, plain as day they are not interested in the truth. It doesn't matter what proof or evidence you could ever show them, they would never believe you. These people have such a hatred for our own country that they cannot bring themselves to look at the FACTS. Oh, no. You can't be bothered to follow such trivial things like FACTS! I could get a TIME MACHINE, take them back to 9/11, and show them FIRST HAND that terrorists blew up the WTC, they'd fall to the ground, kicking and flailing their arms, screaming, "NO! BUSH DID IT! BUSH DID IT! NO WMDS!!!!!" They call us ignorant and stupid for having the wool pulled over OUR eyes. They are condescending assholes who have no knowledge of the past 50 years of international politics, no knowledge of American politics in the past or present, and no knowledge of how to use deductive reasoning to come to conclusions. They have to listen to everyone else who carries around a piece of poorly printed and poorly spelled ANSWER propaganda and has at least 15 objects made of hemp hanging from their flea infested sacs they call necks because they are the 'enlightened' ones.
Final thing, I swear. This one's really good. Ok, here's a picture showing the impact site on the Pentagon where flight 77 hit. This was taken on Sept. 14th, 2001.

Now here is the picture they have up on their website.

Now, I have no idea what the date was when this picture was taken or what the sudden color distortion is (it certainly is NOT smoke), but I can easily guess this picture was changed in multiple ways. I mean, LOOK AT IT! They must think we're complete morons. (Or at least the 15,000 people who are members of this group)
Also, if you go to the website here you can also see a picture where they superimposed a picture of the supposed plane, and it's point is to debunk the hole in the Pentagon. They couldn't even keep the line straight with the fuselage. HILARIOUS!
If anyone is truely concerned about knowing what happened that day, it's all right here and not that hard to understand. This was probably the longest post I've ever had on here, but I didn't even scratch the surface with these guys. I could have a weekly update where I find something else they're lying about and put up the evidence right here. We'll have to see.
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Another Example of Capitalism V. Communism
Check this out. Communism is definitely trying to stifle company competition, and the end result will be keeping the service level where it is, not ever to make a market or product better. As usual. What bad things would come from VoIP? I know phone companies would either lower the price of their service or make it better for the consumer. Phone companies have a nice track record of abusing their customers because they've never had anyone else to go to. Now that VoIP is out there, these guys are really starting to worry about their future.
What China's really worried about is having people call THEIR citizens and not being able to listen in.
What China's really worried about is having people call THEIR citizens and not being able to listen in.
Friday, March 17, 2006
Happy St. Patrick's Day!!!
Jacques Chirac, The French President, is sitting in his office when his telephone rings.
"Hallo, Mr. Chirac!" a heavily accented voice said."This is Paddy Down at the Harp Pub in County Clare, Ireland. I am ringin to inform you that we are officially declaring war on you!"
"Well, Paddy," Chirac replied, "This is indeed important news! How big is your army?"
Right now," says Paddy, after a moment's calculation,"there is myself, me Cousin Sean, me next door neighbor Seamus, and the entire darts team from the pub. That makes eight!"
Chirac paused. "I must tell you, Paddy, that I have 100,000 men in my army waiting to move on my command."
"Begoora!" says Paddy. "I'll have to ring you back." Sure enough, the next day, Paddy calls again.
"Mr. Chirac, the war is still on. We have managed to get us some infantry equipment!"
"And what equipment would that be Paddy?" Chirac asks.
"Well, we have two combines, a bulldozer, and Murphy's farm tractor. "
Chirac sighs, amused; "I must tell you, Paddy, thatI have 6,000 tanks and 5,000 armored personnel carriers. Also, I have increased my army to 150,000 since we last spoke."
"Saints preserve us!" says Paddy. "I'll have to get back to you." Sure enough, Paddy rings again the next day.
"Mr. Chirac, the war is still on! We have managed to get ourselves airborne! We have modified Jackie McLaughlin's ultra-light with a couple of shotguns in the cockpit, and four boys from the Shamrock Bar have joined us as well!"
Chirac was silent for a minute and then cleared ! his throat. "I must tell you, Paddy, that I have 100 bombers and 200 fighter planes. My military bases are surrounded by laser-guided, surface-to-air missile sites. And since we last spoke, I have increased my army to 200,000!"
"Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!" says Paddy, "I will have to ring you back." Sure enough, Paddy calls again the next day. "Top o' the mornin', Mr. Chirac! I am sorry to inform you that we have had to call off the war."
"Really? I am sorry to hear that," says Chirac. "Why the sudden change of heart?"
"Well," says Paddy, "we had a long chat over a few pints of Guinness, and decided there is no fookin' waywe can feed 200,000 FRENCH prisoners."
"Hallo, Mr. Chirac!" a heavily accented voice said."This is Paddy Down at the Harp Pub in County Clare, Ireland. I am ringin to inform you that we are officially declaring war on you!"
"Well, Paddy," Chirac replied, "This is indeed important news! How big is your army?"
Right now," says Paddy, after a moment's calculation,"there is myself, me Cousin Sean, me next door neighbor Seamus, and the entire darts team from the pub. That makes eight!"
Chirac paused. "I must tell you, Paddy, that I have 100,000 men in my army waiting to move on my command."
"Begoora!" says Paddy. "I'll have to ring you back." Sure enough, the next day, Paddy calls again.
"Mr. Chirac, the war is still on. We have managed to get us some infantry equipment!"
"And what equipment would that be Paddy?" Chirac asks.
"Well, we have two combines, a bulldozer, and Murphy's farm tractor. "
Chirac sighs, amused; "I must tell you, Paddy, thatI have 6,000 tanks and 5,000 armored personnel carriers. Also, I have increased my army to 150,000 since we last spoke."
"Saints preserve us!" says Paddy. "I'll have to get back to you." Sure enough, Paddy rings again the next day.
"Mr. Chirac, the war is still on! We have managed to get ourselves airborne! We have modified Jackie McLaughlin's ultra-light with a couple of shotguns in the cockpit, and four boys from the Shamrock Bar have joined us as well!"
Chirac was silent for a minute and then cleared ! his throat. "I must tell you, Paddy, that I have 100 bombers and 200 fighter planes. My military bases are surrounded by laser-guided, surface-to-air missile sites. And since we last spoke, I have increased my army to 200,000!"
"Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!" says Paddy, "I will have to ring you back." Sure enough, Paddy calls again the next day. "Top o' the mornin', Mr. Chirac! I am sorry to inform you that we have had to call off the war."
"Really? I am sorry to hear that," says Chirac. "Why the sudden change of heart?"
"Well," says Paddy, "we had a long chat over a few pints of Guinness, and decided there is no fookin' waywe can feed 200,000 FRENCH prisoners."
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Here Is the Economic Doom the Media Has Talked About
Yeah, yeah. So I haven't posted anything in a while. Here's a doozy! I think you'll like some of these.
4.5 million more Americans are working today than in May of 2003, before the Bush tax cuts reports The Journal.
The economy has generated $750 billion in new personal income in the past 17 months, according to The Wall Street Journal.
3.5 to 4.0 percent rate of growth in 2005, twice as much as Europe even with gas prices, war, Federal Reserve interest rate increases, and hurricane Katrina.
Economic growth in the third quarter was 4.1 percent. That is the 10th consecutive quarter with growth over 3 percent. Not in the past 30 years have we done better.
The DOW is holding at about 11,000, nearing its all-time high of 11,750 set on Jan. 14 2000.
GOVERNMENT REVENUES GROW! The deficit decreased by $96 billion from 2004 to 2005 and the 2005 deficit was just at 2.6 percent of the Gross Domestic Product, compared to 5.1 percent in '85 according to The Chicago-Sun Times.
The US Dollar is up 10 percent versus the Euro in the past eight months.
2005 American household net worth is at $51 trillion according to the Federal Reserve. That looks like it's doubled from '95.
The Labor Department reports that in 2001 - 2005, we saw the best rate of labor productivity over any 4-year period since they started measuring it.
HAHAHA! Well, I guess we seem to be right so far, as usual. Other media orgs are publishing some of these statistics as well, but each will say that the DOW isn't an accurate portrayal of the economy (which it is), or that just because we're doing well now doesn't mean we will in the future (yeah, if we elect more dems in office), or that the tax cut just hasn't destroyed America yet (which it never will).
Listen to me. Ever since the tax cut has been passed, libs have been SCREAMING about deficits, the economy crashing and some sort of recession we're in, how we aren't performing well in the world's economy.
THESE ARE OUTRIGHT LIES!
Check it out for yourself. We're right. They're dead wrong.
4.5 million more Americans are working today than in May of 2003, before the Bush tax cuts reports The Journal.
The economy has generated $750 billion in new personal income in the past 17 months, according to The Wall Street Journal.
3.5 to 4.0 percent rate of growth in 2005, twice as much as Europe even with gas prices, war, Federal Reserve interest rate increases, and hurricane Katrina.
Economic growth in the third quarter was 4.1 percent. That is the 10th consecutive quarter with growth over 3 percent. Not in the past 30 years have we done better.
The DOW is holding at about 11,000, nearing its all-time high of 11,750 set on Jan. 14 2000.
GOVERNMENT REVENUES GROW! The deficit decreased by $96 billion from 2004 to 2005 and the 2005 deficit was just at 2.6 percent of the Gross Domestic Product, compared to 5.1 percent in '85 according to The Chicago-Sun Times.
The US Dollar is up 10 percent versus the Euro in the past eight months.
2005 American household net worth is at $51 trillion according to the Federal Reserve. That looks like it's doubled from '95.
The Labor Department reports that in 2001 - 2005, we saw the best rate of labor productivity over any 4-year period since they started measuring it.
HAHAHA! Well, I guess we seem to be right so far, as usual. Other media orgs are publishing some of these statistics as well, but each will say that the DOW isn't an accurate portrayal of the economy (which it is), or that just because we're doing well now doesn't mean we will in the future (yeah, if we elect more dems in office), or that the tax cut just hasn't destroyed America yet (which it never will).
Listen to me. Ever since the tax cut has been passed, libs have been SCREAMING about deficits, the economy crashing and some sort of recession we're in, how we aren't performing well in the world's economy.
THESE ARE OUTRIGHT LIES!
Check it out for yourself. We're right. They're dead wrong.
Thursday, December 29, 2005
Bush was Right to Reject Kyoto Treaty
Ha! According to Forbes Magazine, Bush shouldn't feel so bad about all the criticism for not signing the Kyoto Treaty. I found this story on newsmax. Apparently, the Kyoto treaty seemed like a good idea at the time, but now that the time has come to cut emissions, the awful truth is sinking in.... In order to cut emissions, you must cut growth!
Even Britain’s Tony Blair, a supporter of the protocol, seemed to admit defeat for the treaty when in a recent speech at the Clinton Global Initiative in New York, he conceded: "No country is going to cut growth” – which is the only known way to cut emissions, according to Forbes.
Oh, but that's not even the best part! It seems that while the European nations were too busy complaining about us not signing the treaty, they were'nt paying attention to their own emissions.
Ironically, even western Europe is not reducing emissions. According to the protocol, western European nations must reduce their emissions to levels 8 percent lower than those of 1990. But in the years since the treaty was negotiated, carbon dioxide levels increased by 7 percent in France, 11 percent in Italy and 29 percent in Spain. Overall, the increase for western Europe was 5.4 percent.
"After many years of European chatter about the monstrous evil perpetrated by George W. Bush in rejecting Kyoto,” Forbes concludes, "it is of possible interest that the increase in carbon emissions in the U.S. during those years was slightly lower (4.7 percent).”
Those who live in glass houses, shouldn't throw stones.
Even Britain’s Tony Blair, a supporter of the protocol, seemed to admit defeat for the treaty when in a recent speech at the Clinton Global Initiative in New York, he conceded: "No country is going to cut growth” – which is the only known way to cut emissions, according to Forbes.
Oh, but that's not even the best part! It seems that while the European nations were too busy complaining about us not signing the treaty, they were'nt paying attention to their own emissions.
Ironically, even western Europe is not reducing emissions. According to the protocol, western European nations must reduce their emissions to levels 8 percent lower than those of 1990. But in the years since the treaty was negotiated, carbon dioxide levels increased by 7 percent in France, 11 percent in Italy and 29 percent in Spain. Overall, the increase for western Europe was 5.4 percent.
"After many years of European chatter about the monstrous evil perpetrated by George W. Bush in rejecting Kyoto,” Forbes concludes, "it is of possible interest that the increase in carbon emissions in the U.S. during those years was slightly lower (4.7 percent).”
Those who live in glass houses, shouldn't throw stones.
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Oh, no!!!!
Saddam Hussein is claiming mistreatment at the hands of coalition forces. Perhaps they gave him Cooler Ranch instead of Nacho Cheesier.
"Yes, I have been beaten, everywhere on my body. The marks are still there," Saddam told the court after sitting quietly listening to testimony. "And I'm not complaining about the Americans because I can poke their eyes with my own
hands."
I don't follow you on that last part, Saddam. Maybe it's bad translation. But here's one word of advice I'll give ya. Don't be trying that eye pokey thing on your guards. It will only lead to more beatings.
"Yes, I have been beaten, everywhere on my body. The marks are still there," Saddam told the court after sitting quietly listening to testimony. "And I'm not complaining about the Americans because I can poke their eyes with my own
hands."
I don't follow you on that last part, Saddam. Maybe it's bad translation. But here's one word of advice I'll give ya. Don't be trying that eye pokey thing on your guards. It will only lead to more beatings.
Thursday, December 15, 2005
Iraqi Voter: Anybody Who Doesn’t Appreciate America Can Go To Hell
They're reporting a heavy turnout in the Iraqi elections. The high turnout has officials hopeful that we might begin pulling out of Iraq next year. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
Somebody at the DNC needs to get the word out to the Iraqi people. "This is supposed to be a quagmire! How do you expect us to take back Congress!"
Also, I found this nifty little nugget of news over at The Political Teen.
“Anybody who doesn’t appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell”
– Iraqi Citizen, voter Betty Dawisha
Check out the video, here.
Somebody at the DNC needs to get the word out to the Iraqi people. "This is supposed to be a quagmire! How do you expect us to take back Congress!"
Also, I found this nifty little nugget of news over at The Political Teen.
“Anybody who doesn’t appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell”
– Iraqi Citizen, voter Betty Dawisha
Check out the video, here.
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
41 Senators Tell Bush: Be Frank on Iraq
Do I still get to be Chauncy? Check out this story from the Kansas City Star. I originally found it on Yahoo but Yahoo can eat shit. Funny how the headline doesn't mention any party affiliation. It all becomes clear in the first paragraph:
WASHINGTON - President Bush is hearing from the Senate on Iraq. Forty Democrats and one independent have signed a letter urging him to be more frank with Iraqis and the American public.
So it's safe to assume this is just politically motivated. Now the democrats are pretending to represent the very same people who will be doomed to annihilation if the dems get what they want: an early withdrawal.
The letter says the administration needs to present "a plan that identifies the remaining political, economic, and military benchmarks that must be met and a reasonable schedule to achieve them."
How many times do we have to say it before you fucking retards get it? We'll be done when the Iraqis can sufficiently take care of themselves! In light of the daily reports of violence and death, it seems that pulling out now would be a bit premature, don't ya think? And this shit about a reasonable schedule! It's fucking ridiculous. It will be done when it's done! If we don't meet some deadline, are you going to want to just give up? We're sorry Iraq. This is taking too long, so we're gonna hand you over to the Ba'athists and the terrorists. This reminds me of a child nagging his parents. "Are we there yet? Are we there yet?" No we're not there yet, and if you don't stop nagging me, so help me, I'll stop this car and give you something to whine about!!
WASHINGTON - President Bush is hearing from the Senate on Iraq. Forty Democrats and one independent have signed a letter urging him to be more frank with Iraqis and the American public.
So it's safe to assume this is just politically motivated. Now the democrats are pretending to represent the very same people who will be doomed to annihilation if the dems get what they want: an early withdrawal.
The letter says the administration needs to present "a plan that identifies the remaining political, economic, and military benchmarks that must be met and a reasonable schedule to achieve them."
How many times do we have to say it before you fucking retards get it? We'll be done when the Iraqis can sufficiently take care of themselves! In light of the daily reports of violence and death, it seems that pulling out now would be a bit premature, don't ya think? And this shit about a reasonable schedule! It's fucking ridiculous. It will be done when it's done! If we don't meet some deadline, are you going to want to just give up? We're sorry Iraq. This is taking too long, so we're gonna hand you over to the Ba'athists and the terrorists. This reminds me of a child nagging his parents. "Are we there yet? Are we there yet?" No we're not there yet, and if you don't stop nagging me, so help me, I'll stop this car and give you something to whine about!!
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
It's been a while since I've gotten one of these....
Check out what I found in my inbox today.
MR.STANLEY AMAH ESQ
AMAH CHAMBER'S
RUE 5 AIRPORT
LOME-TOGO
WEST AFRICA
PRIVATE MEMO.
Dear Friend, I am Mr.Stanley Amah, an Attorney at law, and the Personal lawyer to Engineer W.A.Biggins, a foreignerwho used to work with Shell International Republic ofTogo, Herein after shall be referred to as my client. As it may interest you to know, Your contact was given to me by divine Inspiration at the office of the Chamber of commerce and Tourism in Lome-Togo as I was going through some directories. I decided to contact you in order to champion such a business magnitude without any problem. On the 21st ofApril 2000, my client, his wife and their two children were involved in a car accident along Kara-Sokode express way while arriving from a Holiday to Lome. All occupants of the vehicle unfortunately lost their lives. Since then, I have made several inquiries to their embassy to locate any of their extended relatives and this has also proved unsuccessful. I am contacting you to assist in repatriating the fund valued at US$10.5m,(Ten million and five hundred thousand United States Dollars), left behind by my client before it gets confiscated or declared unserviceable by the Security Finance Firm where this huge amount were deposited. The said Security Finance Company has issued me a notice to provide the next of kin or have his account confiscated within the next twenty one official working days. Since I have been unsuccessful in locating the relatives for over 4 years now, I seek your consent to present as the next of kin to the deceased since you have the same last names, so that the proceeds of this account can be paid to you. Therefore, I will not fail to inform you that this transaction is 100% risk free. On smooth conclusion of this transaction, you will be entitled to 30% of the total sum as gratification, while 10% will be set aside to take care of expenses that may arise during the time of transfer, internal revenue tax and also telephone bills, while 60% will be for me towards any profitable investment in your country. All I require from you is your honest co-operation to enable us see this transaction through. I guarantee that this will be executed under legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law. I expect your urgent response indicating your full interest in this great business transaction to our both mutual trust. Your telephone and fax number will be needed for our easy communication.
Best regard,.
Mr. Stanley Amah Esq.
This is funny as hell, considering that Chauncy Biggins is a pseudonym. It would be pretty hard for a made up identity to claim an inheritance. And oh yeah, I'm pretty sure this is some kind of scam. If I contacted him, he'd be telling me how he needs $10,000 up front to cover filing fees and to bribe officials. I'd be like, if you have access to millions of dollars, why do you need my money? I'm sure that would end the conversation. Also, I don't have any money to send them. Why do you think I'm using blogger? Here's my question. Do you think anybody ever actually falls for this shit?
MR.STANLEY AMAH ESQ
AMAH CHAMBER'S
RUE 5 AIRPORT
LOME-TOGO
WEST AFRICA
PRIVATE MEMO.
Dear Friend, I am Mr.Stanley Amah, an Attorney at law, and the Personal lawyer to Engineer W.A.Biggins, a foreignerwho used to work with Shell International Republic ofTogo, Herein after shall be referred to as my client. As it may interest you to know, Your contact was given to me by divine Inspiration at the office of the Chamber of commerce and Tourism in Lome-Togo as I was going through some directories. I decided to contact you in order to champion such a business magnitude without any problem. On the 21st ofApril 2000, my client, his wife and their two children were involved in a car accident along Kara-Sokode express way while arriving from a Holiday to Lome. All occupants of the vehicle unfortunately lost their lives. Since then, I have made several inquiries to their embassy to locate any of their extended relatives and this has also proved unsuccessful. I am contacting you to assist in repatriating the fund valued at US$10.5m,(Ten million and five hundred thousand United States Dollars), left behind by my client before it gets confiscated or declared unserviceable by the Security Finance Firm where this huge amount were deposited. The said Security Finance Company has issued me a notice to provide the next of kin or have his account confiscated within the next twenty one official working days. Since I have been unsuccessful in locating the relatives for over 4 years now, I seek your consent to present as the next of kin to the deceased since you have the same last names, so that the proceeds of this account can be paid to you. Therefore, I will not fail to inform you that this transaction is 100% risk free. On smooth conclusion of this transaction, you will be entitled to 30% of the total sum as gratification, while 10% will be set aside to take care of expenses that may arise during the time of transfer, internal revenue tax and also telephone bills, while 60% will be for me towards any profitable investment in your country. All I require from you is your honest co-operation to enable us see this transaction through. I guarantee that this will be executed under legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law. I expect your urgent response indicating your full interest in this great business transaction to our both mutual trust. Your telephone and fax number will be needed for our easy communication.
Best regard,.
Mr. Stanley Amah Esq.
This is funny as hell, considering that Chauncy Biggins is a pseudonym. It would be pretty hard for a made up identity to claim an inheritance. And oh yeah, I'm pretty sure this is some kind of scam. If I contacted him, he'd be telling me how he needs $10,000 up front to cover filing fees and to bribe officials. I'd be like, if you have access to millions of dollars, why do you need my money? I'm sure that would end the conversation. Also, I don't have any money to send them. Why do you think I'm using blogger? Here's my question. Do you think anybody ever actually falls for this shit?
Friday, December 09, 2005
Demystifying the Cult of 7G
I suppose you're wondering what the hell all this cult of 7G stuff means. I have thus far made no attempt at explaining it. I assure you, we are no cult in the strictest sense of the word. It all goes back to 1997, when yours truly was a lowly Burger King employee. I worked at the same store as my older brother and several of his friends. In the back of the store, next to where we stacked up the fry baskets, was a little nook that we employees would sneak into to hide from our supervisors and eat our ill-gotten hershey's chocolate pies (working around all that food while hungry was torture most foul!). In that little fortress of solitude, was an apparent alter to some strange deity named 7G. Someone had taken a 7 and a G from our sign and taped them to the wall. Had this place not been closed down a few years ago, I imagine the alter would still be standing. Know this, mortals! G is the 7th letter of the alphabet! and 7 is a mystical number of much power and significance! Attempt to deny the boundless power of the mighty 7G and embrace your destruction! Mwa ha ha ha ha ha!!!
Thursday, December 08, 2005
Surprise! Liberal Canucks Want to Ban Guns
Gun violence in Canada is spiralling out of control!
So far this year some 50 young men -- most of them black -- have been shot dead in Toronto
50 men? Dear God! That must be almost half the population of Toronto!
"I've come to the conclusion that significant change is needed. I've come to the conclusion that we should ban handguns," said Paul Martin at a rally.
But I thought you solved the gun violence problem with the national gun registry. Oh wait. That was just so you'd know who had firearms so you could ban them, right? Too bad hardly anybody bothered to register! So the solution must be to pass some more laws that nobody's going to obey, right?
Some government officials blame the problem in part on smuggling of handguns from neighboring United States.
So by their own admission, banning guns won't solve the problem? Funny how banning something with laws never seems to make the problem go away, does it? My only question is this: have the proponents of gun bans ever considered studying the cases of other countries that have tried the same thing? You know, just to measure whether your proposed legislation will have the desired effect?
So far this year some 50 young men -- most of them black -- have been shot dead in Toronto
50 men? Dear God! That must be almost half the population of Toronto!
"I've come to the conclusion that significant change is needed. I've come to the conclusion that we should ban handguns," said Paul Martin at a rally.
But I thought you solved the gun violence problem with the national gun registry. Oh wait. That was just so you'd know who had firearms so you could ban them, right? Too bad hardly anybody bothered to register! So the solution must be to pass some more laws that nobody's going to obey, right?
Some government officials blame the problem in part on smuggling of handguns from neighboring United States.
So by their own admission, banning guns won't solve the problem? Funny how banning something with laws never seems to make the problem go away, does it? My only question is this: have the proponents of gun bans ever considered studying the cases of other countries that have tried the same thing? You know, just to measure whether your proposed legislation will have the desired effect?
Monday, December 05, 2005
I feel Ashamed
I will admit, I have not been living up to my usual standards as of late. I've hardly been posting at all lately. Is it true that married life truly destroys a man's ability to form opinions? What has happened to me? I promise, that as soon as the news starts getting a little more interesting, I'll throw myself back into it with renewed vigor. You have my word on it!
Friday, December 02, 2005
Monday, November 14, 2005
UN Chief Warns Syria over Lebanon
Ha ha ha ha! It's very rare that I smile while reading about the UN. Apparently, Kofi Annan has some strong words for Syria. If they don't withdraw their troops from Lebanon by April, then the Security Council MIGHT take actions against them. Pardon me a moment while I laugh myself into a hernia. Here are the words straight from the jackass's mouth. Now let's see. What color would best exemplify Kofi Annan? How about yellow? That's a good color for a simpering coward!
"If it's partial withdrawal, I will have to report. If it's total withdrawal, I will have to report," Mr Annan is quoted as saying in the interview to be broadcast on Friday.
"But of course, if they [Syria] do not perform, the council may wish to take additional measures," he adds.
Ugh, it's as painful to the eyes as Kofi's words are to the ears! I'm sure the Syrians are quaking in their boots over your threat of the possibility of further action. "Oh shit, if we don't comply, they might pass a resolution to condemn us and threaten another resolution!"
To read the always eloquent Darth Misha's take on this, click here.
"If it's partial withdrawal, I will have to report. If it's total withdrawal, I will have to report," Mr Annan is quoted as saying in the interview to be broadcast on Friday.
"But of course, if they [Syria] do not perform, the council may wish to take additional measures," he adds.
Ugh, it's as painful to the eyes as Kofi's words are to the ears! I'm sure the Syrians are quaking in their boots over your threat of the possibility of further action. "Oh shit, if we don't comply, they might pass a resolution to condemn us and threaten another resolution!"
To read the always eloquent Darth Misha's take on this, click here.
Friday, November 11, 2005
Veteran's Day
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Biggins still Adjusting.....
I'm sorry I haven't really been posting lately. I feel as though I have been remiss. I think my interest in matters political waxes and wanes from time to time. Lately there just hasn't been much in the news to really grab my attention. We're still at war. Bush is trying to get a new supreme court justice confirmed. Hopefully, he'll succeed, in spite of the Democrats' bullshit. I guess the Republicans cut a bunch of spending from medicaid. More importantly, the Colts just stomped the piss out of the Patriots on their own turf! Now there's a cause for celebration! I must admit, I was a little shocked by Doug Flutie's fourth quarter antics. He intentionally ran into one of the Colts' players, I can't remember whom, and tried to play it up like the guy attacked him. This didn't make it into the news anywhere, probably out of embarrassment for Doug Flutie. I guess he was desperate to turn things around in any way he could. Pathetic. Even more pathetic, was when Belichick threw his red flag, apparently in frustration, and then had to play it off like he was contesting the Colts' last touch down rather than face a penalty for delaying the game. Pretty sad. It was a beautiful game. The Colts' defence really dominated the Pats through most of the game, and really set the pace. I'm not saying the Pats played poorly. They're one of the best teams in the NFL and had some impressive fourth down conversions. They were just outplayed by the best team in the NFL. I've never seen Tom Brady get shaken up like he did on Monday. At least not while playing the Colts in Massachusetts.
8 and 0, bitches!!! GO HORSE!!!!
8 and 0, bitches!!! GO HORSE!!!!
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Chauncy Biggins Witnesses Felony
What a day! I was on my way to handle a bill with a collection agency (ironic, since I work in collections: I'll deal with them in good time-they'll wish they'd never heard of me) when I witnessed a serious crime. I was riding in the car with my dear old mum. (I know what you're all thinking. I have a car, I'm married, and I've got my own place damn it! I just happened to be with my mother today!) We came to a stop at the intersection of Main and High Street in Downtown Muncie, right next to the bus station. There was a man crossing on the crosswalk, exchanging words with a guy in a red, older model suv. The man on foot reached the curb, turned around and said something, pointing off to the south as if to give directions. I didn't hear him, but according to the other witnesses, the man said, "Why don't you get out of the car and say that?" Then the man in the car, sharply turned his wheels to the left and hit the accelerator, going over the curb and hitting the man with his left front fender. I heard the man's leg snap, and he rolled over the hood of the car, falling to the ground. The driver sped away. All the motorists at the intersection, including myself, jumped out of the car and ran to try to get the license plate number. One of the guys made out half of it. The victim, while failing to get up, said it didn't matter. He knew the guy. The police were there inside a minute, followed soon after by the ambulance. They took statements from all of us, and we each wrote a formal statement to include in the police report. The interesting thing is, none of the other witnesses could agree on what kind of car it was that hit him. My mother saw a white pickup truck. Another guy saw a red suburban. Another man said it was a silver GMC Jimmy. It's a good thing that guy knew who hit him, otherwise, they would never be able to catch him. I guess it shows how unreliable memory can be, especially in such extreme circumstances. I certainly hope the man is okay. And I hope the perp gets his ass nailed to the wall. I mean jesus, the guy did it in broad daylight, in front of dozens of people! If I find out any more about it, I'll give an update.
Friday, October 21, 2005
Chauncy Biggins Ties the Knot
Sorry ladies. Just got back from Maui on Tuesday. Quite fun. Got married on the beach to a lovely lady, who often goes by the moniker of Penelope Snood. I suppose that makes her Penelope Biggins. I don't think I'll be doing any real blogging for a few days. I'm still feeling the jet-lag. I still feel like it's five hours earlier than it is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)